Now the Executive Coaching Guru doesn’t feel it is his right to judge others, in regards to their personal appetites, whatever you get up to in the privy of your own dungeon is your business! But there are a few things that don’t sit comfortably.

As long as no one is getting harmed, then basically do what you want, but at the same time you are the leader of an organisation that operates at a global level and has incredible power in terms of its influence, not only within a global market but to all those that look up to their sporting heroes. So you see, it’s not just as simple a thing as saying “it’s a private matter”, because once you take on the mantel of leadership, especially within a marketing led business, then this comes with it’s own level of responsibilities.

Let’s use the example of parent hood, Max has sons, who I can only believe are embarrassed by the exploits of their father. But doesn’t Max have a responsibility to those boys that goes beyond the ‘not getting caught’ to the ‘not blinking well doing it in the first place’. Why? Simply because he had no right to place his family into a ‘potential’ situation where this might occur, which it did. Because these things always come out.

In the same way the Executive Coaching Guru believes that Mr Max Mosely had a responsibility to not place the sport he represents into a place where if something goes wrong, may create a situation that adversely affects it. But Mr Ecclestone (President and CEO of Formula One Management and Formula One Administration) denied that the claims threatened Mr Mosley’s position as president of the motor sport’s governing body, saying, “Has he in anyway damaged F1? No!”; he told the Daily Mail.

Really Mr Ecclestone, you can see nothing that connects the behaviour of this individual to the sport, I bet you’d be singing a different tune if you didn’t like the guy. If you don’t already know Mr Mosley is the fourth son of British World War II fascist Sir Oswald Mosley, a friend of Adolf Hitler, now if ever there was a warning sign that you might not want to get caught up in anything that even has the word German in it as a descriptor, I reckon that’s it.

So what is the message here, well it’s a simple one. The moment you step into a leadership role, you are bestowed with a weight of office that goes beyond the mere operational tasks that come with the role, I can’t believe for one moment that if asked if he believes leadership entails ‘only making the numbers’, that Mr Mosley would agree. No, he’d say, ‘there is more than just output generation to being a leader, one must live by a code that others can aspire to, you have to stand for something bigger than the job itself”. And if he is ever asked this, and replies with that line, I’d agree.

But somehow I don’t think that’s going to happen in the immediate future.